![]() ![]() If u dont trust Lexikos to not have baked viruses into the installer, review the commit log, compile ahk from source urself and ure good to goĬode signing costs money, and provides no guarantees. If u trust Lexikos to not have baked viruses into the installer, download from the official website or github, compare the hashes and ure good to go There is nothing on the roadmap, because there is nothing worth doing ![]() Image.png (124.76 KiB) Viewed 869 times image.png (95.95 KiB) Viewed 869 times image.png (309.75 KiB) Viewed 869 times Hence, I wanted to see what your thoughts were on this, if there is anything on the roadmap that may help to up the security of the program so that these vendors wouldn't consider it malicious, trojan, etc. However, if this is the rationale, one would then mark PWSH and other scripting languages as malicious. I scanned it with some anti-malware vendors with latest signatures and they didn't label it as a threat, virus, etc.:Īt first glance, they may be alleging that because it could be used maliciously they are marking as malicious. Hi, while you may already know, some security vendors are labeling the latest AHK v2.0.2 from Github and website (same SHA256) as malicious: ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |